Current:Home > ContactFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -VisionFunds
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
ViewDate:2025-04-28 08:44:37
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (3)
Related
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Unlikely Firms Bring Clout and Cash to Clean Energy Lobbying Effort
- Keystone Oil Pipeline Spills 210,000 Gallons as Nebraska Weighs XL Decision
- California Startup Turns Old Wind Turbines Into Gold
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- Abortion policies could make the Republican Party's 'suburban women problem' worse
- Is there a 'healthiest' soda? Not really, but there are some alternatives you should consider.
- Accidental shootings by children keep happening. How toddlers are able to fire guns.
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- Dr. Dre to receive inaugural Hip-Hop Icon Award from music licensing group ASCAP
Ranking
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- Fracking Study Finds Low Birth Weights Near Natural Gas Drilling Sites
- Advisers to the FDA back first over-the-counter birth control pill
- Rep. Jamie Raskin says his cancer is in remission
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- New figures reveal scope of military discrimination against LGBTQ troops, with over 29,000 denied honorable discharges
- The History of Ancient Hurricanes Is Written in Sand and Mud
- Clean Power Startups Aim to Break Monopoly of U.S. Utility Giants
Recommendation
The 401(k) millionaires club keeps growing. We'll tell you how to join.
What does the end of the COVID emergency mean to you? Here's what Kenyans told us
RHONJ's Teresa Giudice Wants Melissa Gorga Out of Her Life Forever in Explosive Reunion Trailer
A decoder that uses brain scans to know what you mean — mostly
Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
Taxpayers no longer have to fear the IRS knocking on their doors. IRS is ending practice.
Think Covid-19 Disrupted the Food Chain? Wait and See What Climate Change Will Do
Q&A With SolarCity’s Chief: There Is No Cost to Solar Energy, Only Savings